New MOT's from Jan 2012

[Mike]

Copied from a copy of a copy etc lol!

Found this on another forum:

Copied from UKFN (ANDY G) mot tester for ford

Tonight I attended what is known as an MOT seminar, basically the head honchos from VOSA go to each area, and talk about the MOT scheme, including changes to the test.

As I said in the thread about the new EU directive, as soon as I knew what was changing in the MOT test I would post it up. These changes are to be brought into the test on 1st January 2012, not before. So here goes...

Steering lock operation - Steering locks not engaging when the ignition key is removed will fail.
Engine warning lamps, brake fluid warning lamps, ESP lamps, EPB lamps illumination - ANY of the above illuminated indicating a fault will fail.TPMS (Tyre pressure monitoring systems) warning lamps - Again, if illuminated indicating a fault, will fail.Airbag/SRS lamp illumination - If this warning lamp is illuminated it will fail.
HID Headlamps - Now, a little grey area here. They will be included in the new test, and will fail if they prove to be outside of the specified conditions... but the conditions and reasons for rejections haven't been written/decided yet, so sit tight.
Wiring - Any wiring (loomed or otherwise) that is damaged, or fitted in such a way that could cause damage to said wiring, or other systems will fail.
Engine mountings - Engine mountings will be a part of the test. incorrect mounting, corrosion in a prescribed area etc will fail.
PAS (Power assisted steering) fluid level will be tested.
Rear doors must open in the new test. Previously (and currently), if the tester feels he can access the testable items in the rear (seatbelts, prescribed areas etc) without needing the doors open, they don't need to open. This will now be a failure.
13 pin towbar sockets - tested for correct operation using a plug in testing tool.
Inappropriate modifications or repairs - The wording on this is quite vague at the moment, but if a major component has been modified, and that modification/repair makes the vehicle dangerous or seriously weakens the original component, expect it to fail.
ANY ball joint dust cover - The small rubber boots over ball joints must be intact and free or splits, tears or holes, or it fails.
All CVJ gaiters will be tested - Currently, only the front outer] CVJ gaiters are tested. This new rule extends it to inner and outer, front and rear.
A catalytic converter missing WILL be a reason for failure, regardless of whether or not the emissions limits are met.
Fuel pipe chaffing or damage - Currently they only fail when they are leaking, this rule means that any chaffing or rubbing causing damage will fail.
The braking imbalance limit is lowered to 30% across all axles.
Vehicles built post July 2010 will have to have at least 58% braking efficiency to pass (currently it's 50% for a dual circuit braking system)
Insecure batteries will become a failure
The main beam warning lamp must illuminate with the main beam lamps
All light switches must operate the corresponding lights immediately. No tapping, or wiggling to make it work!


Remember, these changes will all be brought into testing starting from the 1st January 2012. The exact wording of each failure has yet to be released, but the above list is what was presented to us earlier this evening. I've posted all I know currently, so unfortunately I can't help with any questions .

 

[Jonesy]

sounds like they are coming into line with the german MOT, which is meant to be the best on the world

 

[ben_r1]

Inappropriate modifications...

 

[jase]

That's a fail for the laughing gas then Ben

 

[Deako]

Half of this wont come in. They will crack down, but they always put out scare stories so that when the new harder rules are enforced, we all say with a sigh of relief "It could have been worse"

TPMS is option on many VAG cars. So an option ticked at the factory, which is then faulty, would be a fail?? Come on. As if.

 

[RalphyBMW]

Deako - while I share your cynicism don't forget ABS used to be an option on many cars, but if faulty (and no worse than the same car without ABS) it would fail the MoT.

 

[minimaxs1]

thank goodness i've got 2 mates who do MOT's

 

[Foxspeed]

think i might open an mot garage.....time to print money :rofl:

 

[blackpanther]

Usually change my car after 3yrs so shoould be ok.
Only car i ever kept longer was my 182 which i had for 6yrs (only because it never let me down and passed every mot) (i want it back!!)

 

[Roy]

Most of these changes will only appear as adviserys for the next 12 months and will become law in 2013 I was told???

 

[Willis]

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrZRrzfMF3o&feature=related[/YOUTUBE]

Can't see half of that being implemented, but I can't say I disagree with ALL of it.

 

[Fernandez]

One can only presume that with the extra work the MOT tester has to carry out the price of a test is sure to increase. Can't see many businesses being very happy about that if it doesn't and rightly so but yet again another added cost pressure to the already bludgeoned wallet of the british motorist....

 

[stanners]

http://mottesters.co.uk/files/special notices/MOT Inspection Manual.pdf

 

[Graeme GTR]

"A catalytic converter missing WILL be a reason for failure, regardless of whether or not the emissions limits are met."

Lets hope you guys with decats held on to the original OEM cats

The Nazi state marches on, pretty sure were three years away from opening our own camps for "processing" those that dont fall into line.

 

[Fernandez]

"A catalytic converter missing WILL be a reason for failure, regardless of whether or not the emissions limits are met."

Lets hope you guys with decats held on to the original OEM cats

The Nazi state marches on, pretty sure were three years away from opening our own camps for "processing" those that dont fall into line.

Lmao, "processing" fine choice of word....

As for the cat missing will the pre cat not be enough or do I have to gaffer tape next doors tabby onto pipe come testing time..